When OUR ENEMY THE STATE appeared in 1935, its literary merit rather than its philosophic content attracted attention to it. The times were not ripe for an acceptance of its predictions, still less for the argument on which these predictions were based. Faith in traditional frontier individualism had not yet been shaken by the course of events. Against this faith the argument that the same economic forces which in all times and in all nations drive toward the ascendancy of political power at the expense of social power were in operation here made little headway. That is, the feeling that “it cannot happen here” was too difficult a hurdle for the book to overcome.
Archive for the ‘Philosophical Foundations of Liberty’ Category
Albert Jay Nock — Our Enemy, the State
Posted: 5th April 2012 by Marc MkKoy in Philosophical Foundations of LibertyTags: nock, philosophy, state
Everyday Anarchy by Stefan Molyneux
Posted: 4th February 2012 by Marc MkKoy in Essays on Anarchy, statelessness, freedom, Featured, Philosophical Foundations of LibertyA patriot will say that a soldier “serves” his country; others may take him to task for his blind obedience. Acts considered “murderous” in peacetime are hailed as “noble” in war, and so on.
Some words can never be rehabilitated – and neither should they be. Nazi, evil, incest, abuse, rape, murder – these are all words which describe the blackest impulses of the human soul, and can never be turned to a good end.
The Right to Ignore the State by Herbert Spencer
Posted: 22nd June 2011 by Marc MkKoy in Philosophical Foundations of LibertyThe Politics of Obedience — The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude by Étienne de la Boétie
Posted: 29th October 2010 by Marc MkKoy in Featured, Philosophical Foundations of LibertyTags: disobedience, obedience, philosophy, servitude
“Men are like handsome race horses who first bite the bit and later like it,” and even “learn to enjoy displaying their harness and prance proudly beneath their trappings.” They “grow accustomed to the idea that they have always been in subjection, that their fathers lived in the same way; they will think they are obliged to suffer this evil, and will persuade themselves by example and imitation of others, finally investing those who order them around with proprietary rights, based on the idea that it has always been that way.”
Common Law in Illinois
Posted: 23rd May 2010 by Mark McCoy in Commentary and Opinion, Philosophical Foundations of Government, Philosophical Foundations of LibertyTags: citizenship, common law, sovereignty
As a result of the Act, the great body of the English common law became, so far as applicable, in force in this state, and remains in force except so far as it has been modified or repealed by statute, or changed or modified by custom as found in decisions of our courts. The common law, when applicable, is as much a part of the law of the state, where it has not been expressly abrogated by statute, as the statutes themselves. In other words, Illinois is a common law state.
