Archive for the ‘Meet the Bureaucrats.’ Category

On St. Patrick’s Day, 2012, Fairview Heights Police Sgt., James Krumm­rich, was arrested for dri­ving under the influ­ence. There was a hear­ing to rescind the admin­is­tra­tive sus­pen­sion of Krummrich’s driver’s license which was presided over by Judge Brian A. Babka.

Share
photonotavailable

When it comes to select­ing a Demo­c­ra­tic can­di­date from this year’s polit­i­cal menu, noth­ing speaks more to flac­cid com­pe­tency than the St. Clair County Demo­c­ra­tic Party. I find all gov­ern­ment to be a man­i­fes­ta­tion of a soci­etal men­tal dis­or­der, but the boots-on-the-ground for this polit­i­cal pro­fun­dity are those served up on bal­lots across Amer­ica. The […]

Share
Zina Cruse campaign sign.

My one-time  judge, jury, and exe­cu­tioner, Zina Cruse, is run­ning for St. Clair County Cir­cuit Judge. Noth­ing could be sweeter, in my opin­ion, because now she has exposed her soft-pink-underbelly to my wrath for her arro­gant and  unlaw­ful dis­play in court on May 8, 2009 when she had me jailed for con­tempt when I refused […]

Share

NOW comes the Peti­tioner, Mark R. McCoy, and through his MOTION TO RECONSIDER COURTS DISMISSAL OF CASE 10-MR-212 ABSENT A REVIEW OF ALL AUTHORITIES CITED IN PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW, states as follows

Share

NOW comes the Peti­tioner, Mark R. McCoy, and through his MOTION FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER, moves this Court to take Manda­tory Judi­cial Notice of the fol­low­ing mat­ters set forth here­after, pur­suant to the Manda­tory Pro­vi­sions of the Illi­nois Code of Civil Pro­ce­dure Sec­tion 735 ILCS 5/8–1001 et seq., which Motion is made in sup­port of the here accom­pa­ny­ing MOTION TO RECONSIDER COURTS DISMISSAL OF CASE 10-MR-212 ABSENT A REVIEW OF ALL AUTHORITIES CITED IN PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW.

Share

On June 25, 2011, I received an Order from Judge Babka which was entered on June 20, 2011, in response to my Mem­o­ran­dum and essen­tially dis­miss­ing the case. Foot­note 7 In his Order, Babka does not address any of the issues pre­sented aside from the hold­ing in Lindquist as being a case from 1937, which he said was still good law, and attempt­ing to dis­tin­guish that hold­ing with one from Peo­ple Ex Rel. Daley v. Moran, 94Ill. 2d 41, 445N.E. 2d, 67, Ill. Dec 790. Foot­note 8 I con­tend that the Daley case is not on point for pur­poses of my argu­ment. I do aver, in my Mem­o­ran­dum, that the State’s Attor­ney has sole dis­cre­tion in whether to pros­e­cute, but pros­e­cu­tion and arrest are two dif­fer­ent matters.

Share

It is an unfor­tu­nate fact that the pub­lic views the mag­is­trate as the same as, or as a near blood rel­a­tive to, the old jus­tice of the peace and police mag­is­trate of the pre 1964 era. We have been urged by the rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Illi­nois Cir­cuit Court Mag­is­trates Asso­ci­a­tion (does not include Cook County Mag­is­trates) to elim­i­nate the title of mag­is­trate. The urg­ing was in fact a plea to the effect that “what­ever else you do or do not do, elim­i­nate the title of magistrate”.

Share

Meet Brendan Kelly

Posted: 29th March 2011 by Marc MkKoy in Meet Brendan Kelly

Now that Mr. Kelly is State’s Attor­ney, I would expect him to take action on the infor­ma­tion he is in pos­ses­sion of, that being the dash­board video and evi­dence from my crim­i­nal charges, which show the Fairview Heights Police lied and fab­ri­cated evi­dence to sup­port their actions in beat­ing me. I allege the police, Joshua Ale­mond and Aaron Nyman, com­mit­ted acts giv­ing rise to offi­cial mis­con­duct. Despite all my com­mu­ni­ca­tions with Mr. Kelly he fails or refuses to address the mat­ter, yet he claims to be the chief law enforce­ment offi­cer of St. Clair County.

Share

Appar­ently, the State’s Attor­ney in Cook County has more prin­ci­ples than either Bob Haida or Bren­dan Kelly in St. Clair County. I have been pur­su­ing crim­i­nal charges against Fairview Heights Police orig­i­nat­ing with an unlaw­ful traf­fic stop on Feb. 17, 2009.

Share

Since Feb­ru­ary, 2009 I have been involved in bat­tling the State of Illi­nois in attempt­ing to bring crim­i­nal charges against Fairview Heights Police offi­cers, Joshua Ale­mond and Aaron Nyman, for crim­i­nal acts result­ing from an unlaw­ful traf­fic stop.

Share

Since that time I’ve filed a civil law­suit and approached for­mer State’s Attor­ney Bob Haida, State’s Attor­ney Bren­dan Kelly, and Judge John Barice­vic with crim­i­nal charges. They have refused to answer or mis­han­dled the infor­ma­tion. I’ve approached the News-Democrat as well. There is no jus­tice here.

Share

You will be prompted for a username/password to access the direc­tory. The user­name and pass­word are freetospeak.

You will be able to down­load the audio files of these encoun­ters. They are com­pressed in .rar for­mat and pass­word protected.

For a pass­word to unlock the rar files click this link and enter your email address. The pass­word will be sent to you.

Share

Just after he walked through the cour­t­house door the next day, Alli­son says Craw­ford County Cir­cuit Court Judge Kim­bara Har­rell asked him whether he had a tape recorder in his pocket. He said yes. Har­rell then asked him if it was turned on. Alli­son said it was. Har­rell then informed the defen­dant that he was in vio­la­tion of the Illi­nois wire­tap­ping law, which makes it a Class 1 felony to record some­one with­out his con­sent. “You vio­lated my right to pri­vacy,” the judge said.

Share

I’ve been writ­ing and speak­ing about the abuses and fail­ings of gov­ern­ment for some time. Some call me an anti-government zealot. That is like call­ing some­one an anti-Santa Claus zealot. Nei­ther one really exists. Gov­ern­ment is just a con­ve­nient def­i­n­i­tion for an orga­nized crim­i­nal enter­prise used to soothe the con­sciences of its sup­port­ers when sub­du­ing oth­ers with whom it dis­agrees or from whom it demands wealth for its own per­pet­u­a­tion. It may have began as a “good idea”, but there are many good ideas which do not demand alle­giance and obe­di­ence to, what is ulti­mately, a vio­lent expres­sion of power by force. There are places in this world were there is no artic­u­la­ble gov­ern­ing body aside from soci­ety itself. Gov­ern­ment does not rise up from nature.

Share
Judge LeChein

I tried to argue that point and Judge LeChien, after reflect­ing on my objec­tion to the Exhibit, said that I was dwelling on a “punc­til­ios” read­ing of the statute and that the evi­dence did sat­isfy the “intent” of the Act.

Share

Once again, a St. Clair County Judge has exhib­ited cal­lous­ness and arro­gance in refus­ing to fol­low the law; this time against my niece when appear­ing in his court for a seat belt vio­la­tion. Judge Vin­cent Lopinot, of the Twen­ti­eth Judi­cial Cir­cuit bul­lied Melissa McCoy into tak­ing a fine for a seat belt ticket which was never law­fully charged and denied here right to be heard when chal­leng­ing the verac­ity of the offense.

Share

As a mat­ter of course, crim­i­nal charges of any type either felony or mis­de­meanor are ini­ti­ated by the State’s Attor­ney or grand jury in our case man­age­ment sys­tem. Since the doc­u­ments you filed with my office were not filed by either entity, and because some record was required, those fil­ings were assigned case num­ber 10-MR-212.

Share

For ongo­ing emails between myself and the Clerk of the Court, Bren­dan Kelly, click here. For an analy­sis of how a pri­vate indi­vid­ual can bring charges with­out police, click here. This let­ter is part of the ongo­ing saga with my attempt to bring crim­i­nal charges against two Fairview Heights, Illi­nois police­men who, on Feb­ru­ary 17, […]

Share
Zina Cruse

On May 8, 2009, I appeared in court­room 108 for the 20th Judi­cial Cir­cuit Court in response to a Notice to Show Cause aris­ing from a traf­fic ticket issued in 2006 by Collinsville, Illi­nois. The pre­sid­ing judge was Zina Renea Cruse (pic­tured here). It appears that this court­room is for first appear­ances relat­ing to traffic/misdemeanor. Judge Cruse called my name and I approached the bench. When I ques­tioned why I was being ques­tioned about a dis­missed charge, Judge Cruse attempted to tell me that, since Collinsville is in both Madi­son and St. Clair Coun­ties, the Madi­son County part of Collinsville was dis­missed, but not the St. Clair County side. I asked her if there were two charges aris­ing from one inci­dent which were filed in two coun­ties by one munic­i­pal­ity; to which she replied, “yes”. What that implies is that one traf­fic ticket issued by Collinsville sub­jected me to the juris­dic­tion of both Madi­son County and St. Clair County. That is either a bold-faced lie or an expres­sion of incom­pe­tence. Fur­ther­more, how would Judge Cruse have any infor­ma­tion regard­ing the Madi­son County charge when she is sit­ting in St. Clair County? The charge from Collinsville was a munic­i­pal charge and the set­ting was munic­i­pal court in Collinsville.

Share