Archive for the ‘Commentary and Opinion’ Category

With all the infor­ma­tion about how police rou­tinely abuse and even kill peo­ple with lit­tle con­se­quence, there are many who will still pref­ace any com­ments with, “I’m not anti-cop,…” Well, some­one has to say it, and I am anti-cop. The media bom­bards us with head­lines about law enforce­ment band­ing together with assault weapons and vehi­cle searches when “one of their own” is assaulted or killed, like they stand apart from the rest of soci­ety. Truth be told, they do stand apart.

Share

On St. Patrick’s Day, 2012, Fairview Heights Police Sgt., James Krumm­rich, was arrested for dri­ving under the influ­ence. There was a hear­ing to rescind the admin­is­tra­tive sus­pen­sion of Krummrich’s driver’s license which was presided over by Judge Brian A. Babka.

Share

I encour­age Mr. Cook­sey to per­sist with his endeavor and not change a thing on his blog. I’ll even go so far as to offer space on my blog for Mr. Cook­sey to post his infor­ma­tion if the State of North Car­olina shuts him down. I also encour­age peo­ple to review Mr. Cooksey’s blog and fol­low his advice, since he has found a holis­tic way of com­bat­ing dia­betes. I am always try­ing to get peo­ple I know with dia­betes to adopt a health­ier lifestyle and essen­tially fol­low Mr. Cooksey’s approach, even though I had no aware­ness of Mr. Cook­sey until recently. How serendip­i­tous. That said, you can get off of insulin, meds, and harm­ful health con­se­quences from dia­betes if you mod­ify your diet and lifestyle. My “ADVICE” to dia­bet­ics is to fol­low Mr. Cooksey’s suc­cess­ful approaches to over­com­ing dia­betes. There, all that said and I have no license either.

Share

I’m see­ing more-and-more about the phe­nom­ena called “Sov­er­eign Cit­i­zens”. Peo­ple sub­scrib­ing to this the­ory assert that the gov­ern­ment is not some­thing that can com­pel one to fol­low its laws, pay its taxes, or oth­er­wise claim legit­i­mate author­ity over an indi­vid­ual. As a result, one would attempt to claim their right­ful place in the hier­ar­chy of author­ity, and call themselves […]

Share

BIRTH DATES The doc­u­ment “Baby’s with no birth cer­tifi­cates nor social secu­rity num­bers” has been on this web page (http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/) for a con­sid­er­able length of time, and in my view has not got­ten the atten­tion it deserves. To pro­vide some inter­est in its con­tent and merit I have decided to pro­vide the fol­low­ing back­ground information. […]

Share
photonotavailable

When it comes to select­ing a Demo­c­ra­tic can­di­date from this year’s polit­i­cal menu, noth­ing speaks more to flac­cid com­pe­tency than the St. Clair County Demo­c­ra­tic Party. I find all gov­ern­ment to be a man­i­fes­ta­tion of a soci­etal men­tal dis­or­der, but the boots-on-the-ground for this polit­i­cal pro­fun­dity are those served up on bal­lots across Amer­ica. The […]

Share

Cannabi­noids have been found to have antiox­i­dant prop­er­ties, unre­lated to NMDA recep­tor antag­o­nism. This new found prop­erty makes cannabi­noids use­ful in the treat­ment and pro­phy­laxis of wide vari­ety of oxi­da­tion asso­ci­ated dis­eases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflam­ma­tory and autoim­mune dis­eases. The cannabi­noids are found to have par­tic­u­lar appli­ca­tion as neu­ro­pro­tec­tants, for exam­ple in lim­it­ing neu­ro­log­i­cal dam­age fol­low­ing ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treat­ment of neu­rode­gen­er­a­tive dis­eases, such as Alzheimer’s dis­ease, Parkinson’s dis­ease and HIV demen­tia. Nonpsy­choac­tive cannabi­noids, such as cannabidoil, are par­tic­u­larly advan­ta­geous to use because they avoid tox­i­c­ity that is encoun­tered with psy­choac­tive cannabi­noids at high doses use­ful in the method of the present inven­tion. A par­tic­u­lar dis­closed class of cannabi­noids use­ful as neu­ro­pro­tec­tive antiox­i­dants is for­mula (I) wherein the R group is inde­pen­dently selected from the group con­sist­ing of H, CH.sub.3, and COCH.sub.3. ##STR1##

Share

Affidavit and Assertion of a Foreign Neutral

Posted: 6th April 2012 by Marc MkKoy in Political Commentary

I think of all the damnable here­sies that have ever been sug­gested in con­nec­tion with the Con­sti­tu­tion, the doc­trine of emer­gency is the worst. It means that when Con­gress declares an emer­gency, there is no Con­sti­tu­tion. This means its death. It is the very doc­trine that the Ger­man chan­cel­lor is invok­ing today in the dying hours of the par­lia­men­tary body of the Ger­man repub­lic, namely, that because of an emer­gency, it should grant to the Ger­man chan­cel­lor absolute power to pass any law, even though the law con­tra­dicts the Con­sti­tu­tion of the Ger­man repub­lic. Chan­cel­lor Hitler is at least frank about it. We pay the Con­sti­tu­tion lip-service, but the result is the same.”

Share

An arti­cle by Wal­ter Kenas­ton who delves into the ques­tion I have, is the dri­ver license fed­eral in nature? The orig­i­nal piece is  here. Is the Dri­ver License now strictly Fed­eral? by Wal­ter Kenas­ton  “The Florida State Rail­road and Pub­lic Util­i­ties Com­mis­sion does not have power to fix intrastate rates to be charged by com­mon carriers […]

Share

This is a piece I found dur­ing my research that is fairly detailed and pri­mar­ily deals with Florida traf­fic law. How­ever, since I believe the appli­ca­tion of all traf­fic law is fed­eral in nature, I felt it rel­e­vant to include this page as part of my research. The orig­i­nal site is here, but due to host­ing pack­ages expir­ing or research wan­ing, I wanted to cap­ture and repost.

Share

except that until July 1, 1970, sec­tions 502, 506, 507, and
508 of title 23, United States Code, as added by this Act, shall be applic­a­ble to a State only to
the extent that such State is, able under its laws to com­ply with such sec­tions. Except as oth­er­wise
pro­vided in sub­sec­tion (b) of this sec­tion, after July 1, 1970, such sec­tions shall be com­pletely
applic­a­ble to all States. Sec­tion 133 of title 23, United States Code,
shall not apply to any State if sec­tions 502, 505, 506, 507, and 508 of title 23, United States
Code, are applic­a­ble in that State, and effec­tive July 1, 1970, such sec­tion 133 is repealed.
”(b) In the case of any State (1) which is required to amend its con­sti­tu­tion to com­ply with
sec­tions 502, 505, 506, 507, and 508 of title 23, United States Code, and (2) which can­not sub­mit
the required con­sti­tu­tional amend­ment for rat­i­fi­ca­tion prior to July 1, 1970, the date of July 1,
1970, con­tained in sub­sec­tion (a) of this sec­tion shall be extended to July 1, 1972.”

Share

I wanted to take this oppor­tu­nity to reflect back on my Dec­la­ra­tion of Sov­er­eignty, Expa­tri­a­tion, and Dis­so­lu­tion of all Pre­vi­ous National and Polit­i­cal Alle­giance, which I signed in Decem­ber of 2007. With that Dec­la­ra­tion, I renounced any real or implied alle­giance to the gov­ern­ment of the United States, as well as any con­sent to be pro­vided any pro­tec­tion under its laws or oblig­a­tion to obey them. I have heard noth­ing from any­one rep­re­sent­ing the US Gov­ern­ment in refut­ing or acknowl­edg­ing my Dec­la­ra­tion, notwith­stand­ing numer­ous vis­its from var­i­ous gov­ern­ment domains to my web­site, and more specif­i­cally, to my Declaration.

Share

They say, if you have noth­ing to hide you have noth­ing to fear. Well, I have every­thing to hide, but still am not afraid. The fact is, they are here, and they have the means to invade our lives. So, let’s lay it on the table. I’ll save the tax­pay­ers a bit of coin and tell the NSA what they will prob­a­bly find out any­way. I won’t bother encrypt­ing, encod­ing, obfus­cat­ing, or hid­ing what I have to say. The United States Gov­ern­ment is an out-of-control, impe­ri­al­is­tic, total­i­tar­ian, exploita­tive, ter­ror­is­tic Leviathan.

Share

Vox Populi, Methods of Manipulation

Posted: 18th March 2012 by Marc MkKoy in Police State, Social Commentary

Megan ‘Verb’ Kargher are proud to present Vox Pop­uli, Meth­ods of Manipulation.

Share

Obama has tried to dance around the issue of the NDAA and indef­i­nite deten­tion, “promis­ing” he will not apply it to U.S. cit­i­zens, but clearly, if he is will­ing to kill us with­out trial, then he is cer­tainly will­ing to throw us in a con­crete box with­out trial.

Share

Police work is often lion­ized by jurists and schol­ars who claim to employ “tex­tu­al­ist” and “orig­i­nal­ist” meth­ods of con­sti­tu­tional inter­pre­ta­tion. Yet pro­fes­sional police were unknown to the United States in 1789, and first appeared in Amer­ica almost a half-century after the Constitution’s rat­i­fi­ca­tion. The Framers con­tem­plated law enforce­ment as the duty of mostly pri­vate cit­i­zens, along with a few con­sta­bles and sher­iffs who could be called upon when nec­es­sary. This arti­cle mar­shals exten­sive his­tor­i­cal and legal evi­dence to show that mod­ern polic­ing is in many ways incon­sis­tent with the orig­i­nal intent of America’s found­ing doc­u­ments. The author argues that the growth of mod­ern polic­ing has sub­stan­tially empow­ered the state in a way the Framers would regard as abhor­rent to their fore­most principles.

Share

The term “nat­ural per­son” or “nat­ural per­sons,” used in the Bank­ing Act (ch. 16 1/2 , ¶101 et seq.), extends to and applies to “bod­ies politic” and “cor­po­rate.” Fidelity Inv. Assn. v. Emmer­son, 1924, 235 Ill.App. 518, reversed on other grounds 318 Ill. 548, 149 N.E. 530.

Share

(e) The fore­go­ing pro­vi­sions do not relieve the dri­ver of an autho­rized emer­gency vehi­cle from the duty of dri­ving with due regard for the safety of all per­sons, nor do such pro­vi­sions pro­tect the dri­ver from the con­se­quences of his reck­less dis­re­gard for the safety of others.

Share

On June 25, 2011, I received an Order from Judge Babka which was entered on June 20, 2011, in response to my Mem­o­ran­dum and essen­tially dis­miss­ing the case. Foot­note 7 In his Order, Babka does not address any of the issues pre­sented aside from the hold­ing in Lindquist as being a case from 1937, which he said was still good law, and attempt­ing to dis­tin­guish that hold­ing with one from Peo­ple Ex Rel. Daley v. Moran, 94Ill. 2d 41, 445N.E. 2d, 67, Ill. Dec 790. Foot­note 8 I con­tend that the Daley case is not on point for pur­poses of my argu­ment. I do aver, in my Mem­o­ran­dum, that the State’s Attor­ney has sole dis­cre­tion in whether to pros­e­cute, but pros­e­cu­tion and arrest are two dif­fer­ent matters.

Share

This is but one of the meth­ods by which munic­i­pal­i­ties slowly pry them­selves into the lives of the unwit­ting with­out any require­ment for con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity. If you sub­mit, you have no claim. The con­sti­tu­tion, in all its impo­tent glory, is designed to be a tool to pro­tect us from gov­ern­ment. If you pave the path to your lib­erty for which to per­mit gov­ern­men­tal intru­sion, then the con­sti­tu­tion has no place in pro­tect­ing the igno­rant from themselves.

Share