Judge Brian Babka Dodges the Issue of Issuing Arrest Warrants Against Police. Case 10-MR-212 is Dismissed.….for now.…

On June 25, 2011, I received an Order from Judge Babka which was entered on June 20, 2011, in response to my Mem­o­ran­dum and essen­tially dis­miss­ing the case. Foot­note 7 In his Order, Babka does not address any of the issues pre­sented aside from the hold­ing in Lindquist as being a case from 1937, which he said was still good law, and attempt­ing to dis­tin­guish that hold­ing with one from Peo­ple Ex Rel. Daley v. Moran, 94Ill. 2d 41, 445N.E. 2d, 67, Ill. Dec 790. Foot­note 8 I con­tend that the Daley case is not on point for pur­poses of my argu­ment. I do aver, in my Mem­o­ran­dum, that the State’s Attor­ney has sole dis­cre­tion in whether to pros­e­cute, but pros­e­cu­tion and arrest are two dif­fer­ent mat­ters. Read on…

Share

The Right to Ignore the State by Herbert Spencer

As a corol­lary to the propo­si­tion that all insti­tu­tions must be sub­or­di­nated to the law of equal free­dom, we can­not choose but admit the right of the cit­i­zen to adopt a con­di­tion of vol­un­tary out­lawry. Read on…

Share

WIU Wheeler block party demonstrates severity of police state

In this coun­try, if the police don’t like the way a per­son looked at them, or talked to them, they can eas­ily find some stu­pid crime as a pre­text for harass­ment, abuse and arrest. Loi­ter­ing. Dis­or­derly con­duct. Jay­walk­ing. Delay­ing or resist­ing. The list goes on and on. Peace­ful peo­ple sud­denly turn into crim­i­nals if they do not sub­mit like good slaves and [god forbid!]if they dare so much as utter an impo­lite word to a mem­ber of the hal­lowed ranks. Read on…

Share

Cedar Falls, Iowa City Council Demands Keys to Resident’s Property

This is but one of the meth­ods by which munic­i­pal­i­ties slowly pry them­selves into the lives of the unwit­ting with­out any require­ment for con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity. If you sub­mit, you have no claim. The con­sti­tu­tion, in all its impo­tent glory, is designed to be a tool to pro­tect us from gov­ern­ment. If you pave the path to your lib­erty for which to per­mit gov­ern­men­tal intru­sion, then the con­sti­tu­tion has no place in pro­tect­ing the igno­rant from them­selves. Read on…

Share

Judge José Longoria sentences mom for spanking her child.

Benches through­out this coun­try are pol­luted with men and women of such vil­lainy and there is but lit­tle recourse but to either not avail your­self to their unjust sys­tem or know how to defend your­self. Short of some­one suf­fi­ciently out­raged and indig­nant at the abuse which oozes from their gavel with­draw­ing their alle­giance to this sys­tem of abuse, I can see a time where soli­tary indi­vid­u­als will resort to skulk­ing into a judge’s res­i­dence and spir­it­ing them from the com­fort and safety of their bed to be tor­tured or dis­mem­bered as a state­ment of exas­per­a­tion and sat­u­ra­tion. Read on…

Share

People v. Love 393 Ill.App.3d 196, 911 N.E.2d 1015, 331 Ill.Dec. 785

Defen­dant was charged with dri­ving under the influ­ence of alco­hol (DUI). The Cir­cuit Court for the 12th Judi­cial Cir­cuit, Will County, James E. Egan, J., granted defendant’s motion to dis­miss, and found that dis­missal was with prej­u­dice when State refiled DUI charge. State appealed. Read on…

Share

People v. Brookbank 79 Ill.App.3d 412, 398 N.E.2d 632, 34 Ill.Dec. 809

The State appeals from a judg­ment which dis­missed traf­fic charges against the defen­dant, Roger E. Brook­bank, because of the fail­ure of the arrest­ing offi­cer to appear on a con­tin­ued trial date. It con­tends that the defen­dant waived the pro­vi­sions of Supreme Court Rule 504 when he demanded a jury trial and later with­drew that demand with­out com­ply­ing with Supreme Court Rule 505. Ill.Rev.Stat.1977, ch. 110A, pars. 504, 505. Read on…

Share

People v. Novak 68 Ill.App.3d 453, 386 N.E.2d 459, 25 Ill.Dec. 188

On Feb­ru­ary 14, 1978, Frances Sugg, a pri­vate cit­i­zen signed the afore­men­tioned mis­de­meanor com­plaint as com­plainant. Read on…

Share

City of Belleville v. Watts 61 Ill.App.3d 538, 378 N.E.2d 213, 18 Ill.Dec. 749

Where a defen­dant appeared in court on date directed by appear­ance date on traf­fic ticket and com­plaint and entered his plea of not guilty and demanded trial on mer­its to be held on that date, and where in view of fact that nei­ther city nor arrest­ing offi­cer was present in court on that date, defen­dant then moved court to dis­miss charge against him, pro­ceed­ing should have been dis­missed pur­suant to Supreme Court rule and sec­tion of Illi­nois Vehi­cle Code. Supreme Court Rules, rules 504, 552, S.H.A. ch. 110A, §§ 504, 552; S.H.A. ch. 95 1/2 , § 16–106. Read on…

Share

People v. Nelson 18 Ill.App.3d 628, 310 N.E.2d 174

If the State does not present any evi­dence at time set for trial of per­son who pleads not guilty to traf­fic or con­ser­va­tion offense and if the trial court does not grant a con­tin­u­ance to the State, the dis­po­si­tion by the trial court should be on the mer­its, and such dis­po­si­tion and dis­missal should pre­vent any sub­se­quent pros­e­cu­tion on the same charge. Supreme Court Rules, rules 504, 505, S.H.A. ch. 110A, §§ 504, 505. Read on…

Share

Memorandum of law regarding private individual making criminal complaint and the former office of magistrate in Illinois.

It is an unfor­tu­nate fact that the pub­lic views the mag­is­trate as the same as, or as a near blood rel­a­tive to, the old jus­tice of the peace and police mag­is­trate of the pre 1964 era. We have been urged by the rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Illi­nois Cir­cuit Court Mag­is­trates Asso­ci­a­tion (does not include Cook County Mag­is­trates) to elim­i­nate the title of mag­is­trate. The urg­ing was in fact a plea to the effect that “what­ever else you do or do not do, elim­i­nate the title of mag­is­trate”. Read on…

Share