State Sponsored Terrorism, Kidnapping, and Child Abuse

Like a mas­ter of illu­sion, the bureau­cratic jack-booted do-gooders in Texas have com­man­deered the media, your rea­son, and some 416 chil­dren under the pre­tense that they are sav­ing the more nubile young ladies from the rav­ish­ing clutches of per­verted older men. To jus­tify this assault upon a pri­vate cul­ture that con­sid­ers itself out­side the pesti­len­tial crea­ture that is gov­ern­ment, words such as “statu­tory rape, polygamy, and cult” have been capri­ciously tossed about. Tele­vi­sion shows have sought the coun­sel of experts in human behav­ior, lin­guis­tics, and body lan­guage to impugn the out­ward appear­ance, man­ner­isms, inflec­tions, and thoughts of the women. The only indict­ment borne from the witch hunt is they don’t appear “nor­mal”; hardly a jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for invad­ing a pri­vate soci­ety on unfound accu­sa­tions and ter­ror­iz­ing chil­dren and parents.

Despite the per­sonal feel­ings of any of you, or of an assem­blage of crim­i­nals, oth­er­wise known as a leg­is­la­ture, it is not within the purview of the state to inspect, ques­tion, assess, or approve the behav­ior of pri­vate peo­ple or their cul­tures. I am not defend­ing the act of hav­ing sex with 14 year old girls, as the unfounded accu­sa­tions assert, but then again I have not had sex with girls of such age. How­ever, if it had not been for “under­age” girls hav­ing had sex in the past I can assure you all that human­ity would not have pro­gressed to this day. Yet, one has to ask them­selves what is the issue which makes that act objec­tion­able? Is it our per­cep­tion that a dirty-old-man is grat­i­fy­ing him­self at the expense of an unknow­ing and exploited child? Is it that such a pre­cious trea­sure should not be exposed to such a vile and immoral act as sex? Is it pos­si­bly because the gov­ern­ment has not given its approval to such uncon­scionable behav­ior, such as it has with legal­ized mur­der through war­fare, cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, ren­di­tion, tor­ture…. etc.? If gov­ern­ment low­ered the legal age of con­sent to 14 years there is noth­ing you or your indig­nant self-righteousness could do about it. It would be “legal”.

When an “older man” has rela­tions with a “young girl”, where is the state? The state does not pre­vent the act from tak­ing place despite the law which rests on the books. Yet, where are the par­ents when the state vio­lates young women? We have gov­ern­ment man­dated vac­ci­na­tions which expose chil­dren to things more imme­di­ate and inju­ri­ous by way of the com­pounds in the vac­cine than the pos­si­ble harm aris­ing from con­tract­ing the ill­ness to begin with. I com­ment on one sadis­tic jurist named C. Phillip Nichols from Prince George’s County, Mary­land. My com­men­tary can be found on my blog at http://markmccoy.com/blogspot. It is not hard to find. The Jus­tice Depart­ment vis­its reg­u­larly. Malfeasant Nichols threat­ened par­ents with jail time if they failed to inoc­u­late their chil­dren, despite the parent’s objec­tions to intro­duc­ing pathogens and agents to their children’s blood­stream. Nichols’ behav­ior smacks of bio-terrorism and dis­re­gard for lib­erty and parental auton­omy. Like­wise, the gumma which are con­fis­cat­ing chil­dren in Texas are on par with Nichols, sans bio-terrorism. Who is there to save chil­dren and par­ents from the abuse of government?

Why does the state not raid the homes of par­ents who allow or assist in their chil­dren join­ing the mil­i­tary to be used for impe­ri­al­is­tic or cor­po­rate aggres­sion? Are par­ents who place their chil­dren before the canon’s mouth for glory and polit­i­cal mis­chief any less cul­pa­ble for the result­ing harm than those who per­mit a young woman to take an older hus­band? How many of these allegedly “abused” girls have died as a result of their “illicit” union com­pared to the num­ber of chil­dren sent to their deaths by the con­trived and fal­la­cious wars cre­ated by government?

Look at it like this. If sex with chil­dren was a pri­or­ity for gov­ern­ment then they would have raided the Catholic Church and the priests pos­sess­ing pri­apic ado­les­cent pro­cliv­i­ties. If the state were con­cerned with polygamy it would look at itself and the “spousal” rela­tion­ships it keeps with despots, tyrants, and dic­ta­tors abroad. As a mat­ter of fact, worse than polygamy is bigamy wherein one has many mar­riages. Every licensed mar­riage is a three-party con­tract between the two par­ties and the state. Talk about a slut, to use a vul­gar col­lo­qui­al­ism. If gov­ern­ment gave a damn about moral­ity it would imme­di­ately crawl into a hole and pro­ceed to pull kitty lit­ter over itself in order to spare us the stench. If peo­ple really cared about lib­erty, tol­er­ance, pri­vacy, and jus­tice they would train their sights on usurpers and tyrants who deem to act on behalf of the con­sent­ing governed.

I do not believe it is within the purview of any­one to judge any peo­ple, cul­ture, soci­ety, or behav­ior when their rea­son has been cor­rupted and replaced with the arbi­trary and vio­lent con­science of absolute power. If we are about rid­ding the world of evil then let’s start where evil is read­ily iden­ti­fied, known, and abun­dant; in the halls and offices of peo­ple serv­ing that pre­sumed mas­ter, government.