People intimidated by government must be funny to Stan Schaeffer


It hap­pened at an April 9, 2007 Collinsville, Illi­nois City Coun­cil meet­ing. Mayor, Stan Scha­ef­fer, was tak­ing input from “res­i­dents”. This is the part of the meet­ing where the City enter­tains com­ments and con­cerns from those in the com­mu­nity. I had spo­ken a num­ber of times in the past, mainly chal­leng­ing the City’s author­ity to imple­ment a busi­ness license ordi­nance and other things. At this par­tic­u­lar meet­ing I was in pos­ses­sion of a cam­paign flyer paid for by “The Com­mit­tee to Elect Stan Scha­ef­fer”. This flyer is sim­i­lar to pos­si­bly thou­sands that were direct-mailed to poten­tial voters.

The pur­pose of my hav­ing this flyer was the con­spic­u­ous dis­play of Mr. Schaeffer’s City office phone num­ber and his City pro­vided cell phone. These ser­vices are paid through tax dol­lars, which makes them the prop­erty of the Cit­i­zens. Mr. Scha­ef­fer was adver­tis­ing tax payer funded resources in his bid for re-election, thereby using the money of those who may have been aggrieved or in oppo­si­tion to Mr. Schaeffer’s bid for re-election. I spoke not only for myself, but for other Cit­i­zens who express their dis­plea­sure with the City’s progress, or lack thereof, but who are afraid of reprisal from the City, Mr. Scha­ef­fer and other assem­bled coun­cilper­sons included.

In my address, I made ref­er­ence to my speak­ing in agency for those appre­hen­sive voices. I did not say that these per­sons are afraid of Mr. Scha­ef­fer directly or per­son­ally, but intim­i­dated by the poten­tial abuse of the City’s resources, i.e., police, code enforcement,…etc, as can be illus­trated his­tor­i­cally and anec­do­tally. Peo­ple have made it known to me their per­sonal expe­ri­ences that, taken in the con­text of a Cit­i­zen speak­ing out about gov­ern­ment abuse or waste, there was a cor­re­spond­ing neg­a­tive con­se­quence timed con­spic­u­ously close to the dis­sent of the Citizen.

When I addressed the Coun­cil I made it clear that this fac­tion of the pop­u­la­tion was also being rep­re­sented in my address. Mr. Scha­ef­fer is seen to clearly snicker and cover his mouth upon my men­tion of those who fear ret­ri­bu­tion for their dis­sent. I became very angry upon see­ing this dis­re­spect­ful act by Mr. Scha­ef­fer, but man­aged to main­tain my com­po­sure and com­plete my address. Mr. Scha­ef­fer also attempted to limit my address to the arbi­trary limit of 4 min­utes, as set by ordi­nance, and I refused to relin­quish the floor until after I had fin­ished my thought. A minor dis­play of pro­fes­sional petu­lance ensued and the mat­ter defused after a short while.

In my address I used the word “cabal” in ref­er­enc­ing the Mayor and his campaign-supporting con­stituency. He makes a point to define the word for the assem­blage and the future view­ing pub­lic, I pre­sume because hav­ing pos­si­bly been edu­cated in a Collinsville Pub­lic School they may not pos­sess the lex­i­cal apti­tude to under­stand a poly­syl­labic word like “cabal”. I chose that word very care­fully because I believe that Mr. Schaeffer’s bid for re-election is just that, a cabal. The peo­ple are the author­ity, and gov­ern­ment is the reac­tion to our action of form­ing a gov­ern­ment for the secu­rity of our rights and prop­erty. Mr. Scha­ef­fer and his cabal of spe­cial inter­ests, devel­op­ers, and priv­i­leged sta­tus are, through attempt­ing to keep Mr. Scha­ef­fer in office, con­spir­ing to sub­vert the People’s will and reduce them to peon­age by hav­ing their prop­erty taxed, con­fis­cated, or devel­oped against their will. Yes, Mr. Schaeffer…it is a cabal.

I may update this later, but I wanted to get the video out for those who wish to wit­ness a cal­lous dis­play for the jus­ti­fied, albeit unnec­es­sary, appre­hen­sion of other Cit­i­zens to pub­licly con­front what they believe to be oppres­sive, unre­spon­sive gov­ern­ment. More to come…..

Share

About Marc MkKoy

Enemy of the State, iconoclast, critical thinker. Non-citizen and natural man who prefers to not engage in the institutional insanity used to perpetuate an adopted reality of material hedonism in exchange for personal responsibility and personal investment in life. I prefer a path of peaceful resistance, but succumbing to the imperfect, flawed nature of my physical self I must entertain the possibility of violence should my life or safety be threatened by those who believe they possess some moral, political, or other right to subject me to their will. May peace prevail, but those who choose violence welcome the same.
Bookmark the permalink.